Rebuild21: Brief summary of day 1

Rebuild21 is an organisation commited to rebuilding business, politics and media for the 21st century. Sofus Midtgaard kicked off their annual conference today by outlining the four main topics of this year’s conference and talked about how they all face an institutional crisis:

  • Rebuilding finance
  • Constructive media
  • Rebuilding education
  • Rethinking business

Sofus Midtgaard

The event started off with the rebuilding finance theme and a number of prominent speakers gave their take on the financial crisis and what they think we should do.

1) Richard Kelly from IDEO in Shanghai talked about how the financial crisis should be seen as a crisis of values more generally. Financial services have been cut off from the real world and we may need to look at how to innovate in financial services again.

2) Jem Bendell talked about how finance has failed and how there are unused assets and unmet needs in the current system, offering the example of how many unemployed people claim benefits while many social services are being cut back due to austerity. We need to get people back to making and trading, Jem Bendell argues, as the current system of how we exchange things and time has broken down. You can see his presentation here

3) Umair Haque suggested that we are facing an institutional breakdown in our societies and economies. A key reason for this malfunction is oppulence: people have for too long wanted to have more, bigger, faster and cheaper commodities and our institutions have been geared to fulfil this desire. To address the issue we need to develop a new model of prosperity which Haque calls (Eudaimonia). This can be defined as a richer conception of prosperity where relationships matter and where a rich civic life is valued – we need to reimagine what wealth is. Part of this is also reconsidering whether GDP is an appropriate way to measure success in our economy.

All three presenters mentioned above seem to agree that the current financial system has been severed from the real world and will need to get back on course to service society rather than vice versa.

I hope to return to the remaining presentations in more detail soon but wanted to share these ideas straight away.

You can find a a copy of the full programme from Rebuild21 here.

Posted in Society | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Hansard report on Creative Industries in Northern Ireland

The Hansard report on how to support cultural and creative industries in Northern Ireland is out. I think the following points might be of interest to any place that wants to thrive in the creative and cultural economy.

Key points:
*Graduates need to have the opportunity to be mentored, because although they obviously have creative skills, their business skills are significantly underdeveloped. So, it is about matching creative talent and business acumen.

* Highly educated but low-paid sector. It is almost completely unsupported, with no professional body. No-one to voice interests of sector.

* Currently there is a lack of transparency and coherence in policy as CI is spread across several departments with no clear ownership.

The full report can be found here.

Posted in Creative industries | Leave a comment

What happened to our cultural utopia(s)?

Should art and culture be useful in resolving societal issues and do artists need to relate to current affairs? – and also should politicians relate to contemporary art?

Last night the Danish Minister for Culture, Uffe Elbæk, hosted the second debate around cultural life in Denmark in a debating series entitled Culture on the Edge. The theme this time was “What happened to our utopias?” The invited guests were Britta Lillesøe (“Minister of Culture” for the Freetown Christiania) and the contemporary artist John Kørner.

Untitled

I was interested in hearing what the debate would focus on especially because the topic was in many ways similar to Mission2062 in Paris where I had the chance to discuss what culture will look like in 50 years time.

Britta Lillesøe started by telling about how Christiania in many ways is a utopia for culture. The freetown has found ways of working with artists in different ways allowing them to work in public spaces without having to deals with reels and reels of red tape. Britta talked about artists and life artists and emphasised that we need space for both and that the postive meeting of the two is what creates a positive everyday life. She also mentioned that good preconditions creates good people and suggested that the Minister of Culture considers this in his work.

John Kørner was more critical and especially feels there is a lack of engagement with contemporary art. He felt that politicians to a larger degree will need to see the potential in contemporary art rather than seeing contemporary art as a necessary evil. Kørner does not feel that artists need to place themselves within a specific ideology but think they have the ability to look at society in a broader humanistic perspective. Contemporary art works in it’s own language paradigm and it will only be relevant if we can create a social community around it.

Uffe Elbæk responded to John Kørner’s challenge by asking for more contemporary artists’ who are willing to reflect about and define the role of art. He is interested in artists who dare to vision what things could be like if they were different and also to look at two of the big challenges as he sees it:
1) Crisis of empathy
2) Systemic crisis where neither the public sector, nor the private sector nor NGOs can alone tackle wicked problems like climate change, economic recession, migration.

Kørner lamented the lack of strategic thinking about the large number of museums and cultural houses which have over the last ten years been built in Danish cities and towns. There does not seem to have been any thought about what to put in these houses.

Finally, Uffe Elbæk mentioned that his vision is to move from a paradigm of “culture and business”, we will move into a paradigm where culture is business.

Posted in Culture | 4 Comments

Key Takeaways from the Urban Gardening Growthshop

Urban Guerilla Gardening

Yesterday approximately 100 people attended the Urban Garden Growthshop in Aarhus to green the city. Alongside the planting activism the organisers, Center for Urban Kunst, had put together an interesting seminar. The seminar speakers included both academics and practitioners from arts, urban planning and related disciplines.

Some of the main things I took away were:

Lone Koefoed kicked off with an insightful presentation about public space and outlined four main strategies for creating street art or interventions in the public space:
a) The temporary
b) Emphasise detail
c) Surprise
d) Change our perspective

Lone Koefoed also dwelled at the fact that life in city space is often staged through the commercial, offering the example of how expensive cafés in Aaarhus own the right to serve edibles in the public urban space along the banks of the re-opened Aarhus river.

In his presentation Jesper Elg discussed his experience of working with art in public space. Interestingly, Jesper talked about street space and public space as an alternative to commercial space. Jesper works with large public works of art and recently invited the American artist Shepard Fairey to Copenhagen to work on eight murals, temporary works in the public space. For Jesper a key theme for this type of work is to make public spaces which are in dialogue with users and citizens.

In her presentation Kristine Samson talked about the performative city. She talked about urban gardening as an urban phenomenon. She also talked about new ecologies in the performative city, in Copenhagen this is exemplified by events like Copenhagen marathon and the music festival Distortion. Referring to the French philosopher Georges Bataille, she talked about operative architecture and suggested that urban gardening could be seen as being operative in this type of way too. Kristine suggested a long list of ways to do urban gardening – here are the three first:
#1 Guerilla gardening and urban activism – contesting the masterplanned city
#2 Pimp your pavement – skilling up, building identities, aesthetic
#3 Reuse/recycle the materiality of the city.

Trevor Davies, who is heading up Aarhus’ bid to become European Capital of Culture in 2017 shared some of his thinking around what makes cities successful. He sees a trend of cities which define ethical paroles as becoming the frontrunnners in the coming years and mentioned Toronto as an example. Also cities are removing themselves from the national discourse because this discourse is no longer useful for them. He also mentioned that when we talk about public spaces in cities, we need to use these also to exhibit in public our issues and challenges as citizens.

Finally, Louise Fabian from Aarhus University gave and thought-provoking presentation on how DIY urbanism usurps public space with a series of strategies – and finally asked whether events like the Urban Guerilla Gardening workshop signify a new bottom-up urbanism and if they do – how can we interpret this?

The event also had a visit by the Danish Minister of Culture who asked the panel the interesting question of what can be done to leave space in cities for experimentation for new thinking and innovation in cities. I will leave this question to you to answer.

Untitled

Posted in Cities, Culture | Leave a comment

What is creativity and why is it crucial to cities?

On Saturday, 5 May, I will be giving a talk about the importance of creativity in cities at the Urban Gardening event in Aarhus. This is a key issue for me and for Centre for Cities and Creativity.
In a radio interview Grayson Perry listed the following five (untrue) myths about creativity, which I always find a useful point of departure for a discussion about creativity:

1) Eureka moment
2) Anyone can do it – we can’t all be brain surgeons…
3) Drugs are good for you
4) Creative people are a bit mad
5) Britain’s got talent – the notion that there are geographically some countries where creativity is more inherent

Basically this sums up to one thing – you can do it, but you need to work hard for it and there are no shortcuts.

In his think piece What makes cities creative?, Charlie Leadbeater offers a useful distinction between a “narrow” and a “broad” understanding of creativity in the city. The narrow definition mainly focuses on the creative class, ie. people working within the creative industries, to provide creativity in the city and for this relatively small group to act as a kind of driving force for creativity. However, Leadbeater argues that cities will in the future need to look at a much broader understanding of creativity to tackle the complex challenges they are facing. This creativity will not only deal with culture but will look at all aspects of life in cities. It is still unclear exactly how this will look like. The Urban Gardening workshop in Aarhus tomorrow may be a good first step to get people to realise that creativity can applied to many spheres of city life.

Posted in Cities, Culture | Leave a comment

Key takeaways from the first Gaming Forum in Athens.


Yesterday I had the pleasure to participate in the first Gaming Forum in Athens through an invitation from British Council in Greece. The event was hosted at The Hub in Athens, a great space for this type of event which combined the practical with the theoretical in a wonderful way. The lobby area was packed with game consoles and there was a nice big, cool conference hall for the presentations. There were lots of presentations – about 15 in total – and lots of good presentations.

I took the following four things away with me.

1) Importance of games. In is introductory remarks, Dr Gregory Yovanof said that games are so important because people of all ages play. He also mentioned games as being a participatory and experiental learning style.

2) Will violent computer games produce violent kids. Elina Roinioti and Eleanna Pandia gave an interesting paper on their research into this topic .They argued for the need to distinguish between violence and aggressivity. Violence mainly being reaction of the psyche when under too much pressure and not causally related to gaming per se. Agressivity in gaming, however, is the planned, contained conflicts within certain perimeters of the game.

3) Athens Playathon. Chloe Varelidi and Maria Saridaki gave a great presentation about the Athens Playathon which takes place in late September and most certainly turn the city of Athens into a big gameboard with an urban backdrop. There is a chance for all gamers to submit there ideas under the Open Call until 8 June.

4) Finally Eric Parkes from Gipht.me shared his thoughts on the coming trends in gaming
a) Niche markets – games will need to cater for smaller niche audiences. The time of games covering large audiences may not be over but there is a better chance of success if you focus on niche.
b) Alternate reality games will be a growing market. ARG are games that mix game play with the real world. Eric share the example of ARG being used at the launch of the Steven Spielberg film AI – where a fictional character appeared in the credits of the trailer – when people googled the name, they would be led to a website with puzzles to be solved.
c) Games as art. Games with a high aesthetic quality and with a creative edge that will keep people captured.

You can find the full list of speakers from the event here

Posted in Cities, Culture | Leave a comment

Reflecting on FutureCityGame in one of the world’s oldest cities.

Tomorrow I will be giving a presentation on FutureCityGame at the inaugural Gaming Forum in Athens. In the preparation for this I have had a chance to reflect what were the key elements for successful the Future City Games. There are many reasons why the game has been successful, not least the strong partner organisations, like Centre for Local Economic Strategies (full disclosure: I am a CLES board member) and Architecture + Design Scotland but also DODO in Finland and CKPZ in Czech Republic.

Preparation
The start up pack for Future City Game which explains how to plan a game, which stakeholders to involve, how to recruit players for the team – the game is not just one or two days but takes place at least 3 months before and 1 month after the actual event. The Start up manual is one of the key elements of FutureCityGame’s success can be downloaded from here

Diversity in the teams – a cornerstone in any innovation process is to get as diverse experiences as possible together.

Practitioners as external advisers Practitioners who work with city issues on a daily basis can provide the teams with indispensable support in building a strong business case around their idea. The teams decide when and how to consult the experts. To give the experts, or practitioners as we prefer to call them, a stake in the ideas, we sometimes allow them to be part of the voting process at the end of the game.

Real world testing
In addition to talking to practitioners, the teams are given almost half a day to test their idea.

The fun factor and the gaming element
The GamesMaster and often co-GamesMasters have a key role in ensuring that the dynamics in the teams flow. Sometimes we have small competitions during the steps. Our experience is that professionals and amateurs forget their place in hierarchies when they are in a team together and under pressure to do better than other teams. While we encourage people to create a friendly atmosphere it is important for us that people in teams do not feel intimidated by fellow team members.

You can read more about FutureCityGame here:

FutureCityGame was developed by British Council in partnership with Centre for Local Economic Strategies and URBIS.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Logo for Centre for Cities and Creativity

Hot off the press – here is our new logo
The logo has been designed in collaboration with the artists Marie Melchiorsen and Dominik Louda and the graphic designers at Logomotiv.com. The idea behind the graphic image has been to use the three c’s in the name Centre for Cities and Creativity to create an image of a flower symbolising aesthetic beauty – or a propeller symbolising innovation and change. Let us know what you think of the new logo.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mission 2062 postcard follow-up

My first coffee meeting following after sending handwritten postcards from Mission2062 was with one of the most experienced cultural leaders in Denmark, Christian Have.

Christian was very supportive of our mission and agreed with the main points mentioned on the postcard (see the full text here). We discussed how it is vital that culture is being brought into other spheres of life, and Christian pointed out how he sees well-defined and diverse cultures as a prerequisite for creativity. Also, we discussed how networking has played a quintessential role in getting big cultural productions off the ground. We discussed how much the rest of society can learn from these lessons – and will have to learn from the sector to be succesful in the years to come.

We also discussed how creative entrepreneurs will be crucial in the future for a succesful cultural life. Creative entrepreneurs are a unique hybrid of the cultural world and the rest of society and have a unique capacity to “translate” between the different mindsets and add new value to society. One of the key traits of good creative entrepreneurs is the ability to deliver on your promise.

We agreed to send a short message around to the remaining people in the group, several of them, including the Danish Minister for Culture, have asked to be kept informed of the progression on these talks.

Christian Have has for a number of years coordinated big cultural events in Denmark and is currently on the board of several big cultural organisations, including the Danish Royal Theatre. You can read more about Christian Have’s work on Have Kommunikation’s website.

Posted in Culture | Tagged | Leave a comment

DK_UK collaboration on the theme of cities and integration

On Friday last week an interesting exhibition focusing on a cultural exchange of architects between the UK and Denmark opened at the Danish Architecture Centre in Copenhagen. The idea behind the project has been to look at how professionals from different places can benefit from collaborating. The main focus of the collaboration was cities and integration. You can also find more information on this important theme in project like Council of Europe’s Intercultural Cities project.

In her opening words, the Danish Architecture Centres programme leader, Mathilde Serup, mentioned that one of the key objectives of the project had been to focus on how knowledge sharing can benefit the creative process.

Subsequently, Jesper Pagh, editor at the Danish Archtectural Press, discussed the role of the architect and offered the suggestion that architects possess an ability to produce concrete visual pictures; pictures and visualisations which enable us to ask the right questions. As an example, Jesper mentioned the congestion charge which was recently proposed for Copenhagen. The proposal was forfeited, he felt, mainly because the wrong question were asked (around the cost-benefit of the solution) rather than a question around whether we would like a city-centre with fewer cars.

Finally the rector of the Danish School of Architecture, Lene Dammand Lund, spoke passionately the possibilities of internationalisation that the project offers in terms of knowledge sharing and not having to start from scratch every time a new city needs to grapple with an issue. It is important to learn from other practitioners. She also mentioned the danger of travelling ideas akin to carbon copy culture discussed at Mission 2062 where ideas are mainly replicated from place to place without any foundation in the local context of the place where they are being used.

The exhibition itself includes the sketch books and process diagrams of the 6 architects’ work in Copenhagen. It is a joy in this digital age to be able to hold the tangible outcomes of the creative process in your hand.

Also there are video interviews with the six participating architects. You can find written interviews with some of the particiapants on the homepage of the Danish Architecture Centre.

You may also want to peruse the inspirational programme which the Danish architects were offered when visiting London.

Posted in Cities | Tagged , | Leave a comment